Monday, 18 February 2013

Jack Wilshere Vs Tom Cleverley

Many football fans have recently been making the comparison between Jack Wilshere and Tom Cleverley due to them both being young, up and coming central midfielders. Both look extremely promising and possess huge potential but we're going to take a look at who comes out on top when they're compared. 

Tom Cleverley began as part of Bradford's youth set-up after growing up in West Yorkshire. He joined Manchester United as a trainee in 2000, developing there before representing the under-18's in the 2005/2006 season. In January 2009, Cleverley went on loan to Leicester, however this loan spell was ended early as he suffered a serious shoulder injury that would require surgery. In August of the same year, he bounced back with a loan spell at Watford where he scored on his debut. Cleverley enjoyed success in this loan spell and happened to extend it into 2010, although again it was one cut short through injury. He did however, receive the player of the season award. After returning to United, Cleverley then came across a third loan deal, this time it would take him to Wigan where he was one of their standout players in the season. After his succession of loan spells, Cleverley would finally progress into United's first team, emerging as one of the top talents around in his position and being rated very highly by Ferguson. He made his full debut for the National team on 15th August 2012 in a friendly against Italy and has since accumulated a total of 7 caps for his country.

Wilshere's young career was not so full of loan spells, experiencing just the one at Bolton Wanderers where he impressed many and made a name for himself. Before this he only featured in Arsenal friendlies and a rare first team game. He became Arsenal's youngest ever debutant at the age of 16 however his appearances were rather scattered. It took until the season of 2010/2011 for Wilshere to really breakthrough into the Arsenal team properly, when he made 35 league appearances, grabbing 1 goal and 3 assists, whilst at the same time developing into one of the hottest prospects around. He was called up to the senior National squad in 2010 and made his debut against Hungary. However, his progress would be halted by an awful injury and he would face 14 months on the sideline, not ideal for anyone but especially not for a youngster just coming through. Similarly to Cleverley, Wilshere has now accrued 7 caps for his country at the time of writing.

If you take a look at how the two have performed this season: 

Despite this being Wilshere's comeback season and the first few of his appearances being short in duration, he seems to come out on top in these stats. Cleverley just betters him slightly in terms of pass accuracy and goals, everywhere else Wilshere dominates. However in Cleverley's defence, he is playing at Manchester United and rarely does he get a full 90 minutes and understandably so with the talented midfield they have. United have strength in depth in their squad and this means Ferguson does a lot of rotating meaning Cleverley isn't a regular every week.

I feel that it is difficult to compare the players, solely based on stats as whilst they're both central midfielders, they're different types of players. Cleverley is a creative midfielder with a touch of magic in his boots, whereas Wilshere is your tough tackling, box to box midfielder who drives his team forward with the ball. However, this season, I feel that Wilshere has been playing with a little more freedom and has been able to receive the ball higher up the pitch. This is reflected in his chances created stat in which he surprisingly beats Cleverley. 

In conclusion, I would say that both players are incredibly talented and have very bright futures ahead of them, however I think Wilshere just nicks it. Wilshere is just 21 and has 2 years on Cleverley and with his 14 months out, I find it staggering how he is already competing at the level he is. Don't get me wrong, both are excellent players,  I just feel that Wilshere has the talent to become a world class player, whereas Cleverley will become one of the top midfielders in the League, however this is all just my opinion. One thing that is for sure, the combination of both for England will definitely be a partnership to be feared in the future, hopefully building the core of a great team.

Who do you think is the better player? Tell us in the comments section below!

Thanks for reading, I hope you enjoyed it!


  1. i feel that cleverley is like and english xavi and wilshere is the english iniesta Both will be great for england

  2. Agreed, both will form a great partnership for England!

  3. I feel that they can't be compared due to the fact that Cleverley has adopted more of a holding role in midfield whereas Wilshere is seen more of a playmaker in attacking midfield. Both fantastic in their roles and will form a formidable English partnership hopefully but with Wilshere staying at Arsenal I fear that for the quality of a player he is he'll miss out on some well deserved silverwear.

  4. Yeah, I feel Wilshere will always be limited by his team's astonishing inconsistency around him and Cleverley will always have to be rotated at United as they have such strength in depth.

  5. Wilshere shouldnt really be compared to someone like Cleverley. He is in a different league.

  6. Cleverly at 19: On the bench for Leicester
    Wilshere at 19: Won MOTM against Barcelona
    Cleverly shouldn't be compared to Cleverly

  7. Wilshere is already a far better player then Cleverly, even after his injury and the 2 year age gap

  8. Thanks for sharing your thoughts about up. Regards

    my homepage: website


Please don't post spam comments or adverts or they will be deleted!